"While Ph. Ds are being hired to teach wealthy youth, Troops to Teachers is preparing retired military personnel on a "fast track" for certification in education adminstration, to provide leadership and structure in at risk schools." The major agrument is the culture of the privledge within schools that advocates choice while in at risk schools it is the culture of miltiarism. This argument is central but I feel that it goes further than just this. Education is suppose to be the great equalizer but in reality it is a reflection of our society with rigrid class, gender, and racial structure. Children are not giving the same chances in schools that other more wealthy districts are and in a public service such as education this is not acceptable.
Also, I agree that urban schools tend to be more militray than surburban. At my placement the students are not allowed to talk at lunch and have to face forward. Classes are very structured. However, it seems that most students like the structure because it comes with explanation to why it is being given. They do not just yell at students for no reason.
Coffee Beabadoobee Lyrics Ukulele Chords
-
Chords ukulele cavaco keyboard tab bass drums harmonica flute guitar pro.
Chordify gives you the chords for any song
Five strum patterns that will work f...
5 years ago
1 comment:
Riemer, I agree with what your saying about the wealthy having more well trained teachers and the poor students being educated in a prison atmosphere. I think its interesting the feeling i had walking into school without metal detectors or even a police officer presence, compared the feeling i get walking into an inner-city school and having to pass through a metal detector. My whole self esteem and sense of security is completely abolished and i almost feel violated or nervous. By trying to increase security it seems to decrease my sense of security.
Post a Comment